Let Freedom Sing

I know that I am not the only internet user who reads BSO and listens to online radio (often at the same time). If you are like me and take advantage of any of the great internet radio providers available for free, or if you just believe that music should be accessible to all, listen up: your freedom to listen to music online is in danger.

Recently, the Copyright Royalty Board ruled that internet radio providers will have to start paying a flat rate based on the amount of content and number of songs they play. Currently, the only have to pay a portion of the profits they make from their listeners. This rule change, which could go into effect by the middle of May, will endanger countless non-profit internet radio providers, including NPR and Pandora Internet Radio. It is obscene that these free providers will be pushed out of business by the new rules. The current system, which applies the same rate to satellite and internet radio providers, is far fairer.

Please ask your legislators to support the Internet Radio Equality Act, H.R. 2060, sponsored by Reps. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and Don Manzullo (R-IL). The bill would overturn a recent decision by the Copyright Royalty Board to charge internet radio providers a flat rate per song played, rather than the current rule to charge a percentage of their profits.

This ruling is entirely unfair to non-profit internet radio, such as NPR and music sources that currently offer internet users like us free music. The current system, which charges internet radio providers at a rate identical to satellite radio providers, allows many Americans access to free music online. This access to culture enrichens lives.

As an internet radio listener and music lover, I urge you to stand up for free internet radio.


2 Responses to Let Freedom Sing

  1. Sworez says:

    If you are a true music lover shouldn’t you pay a small amount for the privalege (not right) of listening to an artists work?

  2. Matt says:

    This isn’t an argument over abolishing copyrights – perhaps that will come in a while. This is an argument that the amount a music provider pays should be proportionate to the amount of money they make off the deal, not how much music they provide. In the cases of NPR, Pandora Internet Radio, and even satellite radio (very much for-profit, by the way), it seems more just to charge them based on profits.

    After all, if these services are serving markets selflessly, why should they be punished? If they are out for profit, it’s a definite business incentive to make royalties profit-based so that newcomers to the market can get off the ground. Profit-based royalties increases competition and provides low-cost or free music to people who could never experiment with different artists if there was a cost attached.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: